Unified affiliate API
Connect CJ, Awin, Impact & more through one API
Treat this page as the map: who connects upstream, how normalization sits in the middle, and which downstream stacks consume the same JSON. It is deliberately higher level than the affiliate API reference (field and listing mechanics). The multi-network consolidation narrative is on this same page in the sections below. Below: why teams adopt a single affiliate API instead of running a multiple affiliate networks API strategy by hand, and why Feedico behaves like an affiliate aggregation platform without replacing your programme relationships.
How it flows
Many upstream APIs - one normalization layer - your stack.
Normalization + sync
Feedico
One schema · Bearer auth · Dashboard
Why teams use Feedico
The job is not “integrate more APIs” - it is ship coupon UX, cashback logic, and content faster with less backend drag.
Faster integrations
One client to implement and extend - new programmes don’t reset your roadmap.
One schema
Firms and coupons share predictable shapes; filters and pagination work the same way.
Lower maintenance
Network-specific drift is handled on our side, not in every service you deploy.
Multi-network support
CJ, Awin, Impact, Partnerize, Admitad, TradeTracker, Takeads, Take Deals - and one surface.
Unified auth
Bearer token from your account - no juggling five OAuth models in production.
Supported networks
Connect the sources your account is approved for. Feedico ingests and maps them into one contract - no trademark logos implied; names refer to third-party platforms.
- CJ Affiliate
- Awin
- Impact
- Partnerize
- Admitad
- TradeTracker
- Takeads
- Take Deals
Why this matters now
Building affiliate integrations by hand does not scale. Most teams burn sprint after sprint touching OAuth quirks, schema drift, and rate limits across networks - instead of shipping the product users pay for. If your roadmap assumes “one more network next quarter,” you are already past the point where a unified layer pays for itself.
Without Feedico vs with Feedico
Without Feedico
- Multiple REST/SOAP clients to own and patch
- Different auth models and token lifecycles
- Incompatible field names and enums per network
- Manual ETL and brittle normalization in your codebase
- Slower integrations - every new network is a new project
With Feedico
- One API for firms and coupons
- One auth - API bearer token from your account
- Unified rows with provider tags when you need provenance
- Dashboard + sync so ops is not blind
- Faster shipping - add a connection, keep the same client code
Built for real use cases
Coupon & deal sites
Aggregate live coupons from multiple networks without maintaining one client per programme.
Cashback & rewards apps
Normalize merchant and coupon feeds so cashback math and UX stay consistent.
WordPress publishers
Power Gutenberg blocks and shortcodes from one token-backed API instead of brittle scrapers.
Internal commerce tools
BI, ops, and partner dashboards consume the same JSON contract - no duplicate ETL per network.
API example - list coupons (real shape)
List endpoints use POST with JSON (filters stay out of URLs). Replace the token with yours from the dashboard.
curl -s https://api.feedico.io/api/v1/me/coupons \
-H "Authorization: Bearer fdco_your_token" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"page":1,"pageSize":5,"firmName":"nike"}'{
"ok": true,
"recordCount": 42,
"page": 1,
"pageSize": 5,
"availableProviders": ["cj_affiliate", "awin_affiliate"],
"coupons": [
{
"id": "…",
"networkId": "…",
"networkName": "Example Merchant",
"provider": "cj_affiliate",
"title": "10% off full price",
"code": "SAVE10",
"offerUrl": "https://…"
}
]
}Field names follow the customer OpenAPI spec; omit optional filters to page across all connected data.
Still the same product story
You remain responsible for programme approval and compliance at each network - Feedico does not replace those relationships. It replaces the integration tax: one contract to learn, one client to deploy, one place to debug when data looks wrong.